Qt for MCUs vs LVGL: A Comparative Study from Design to Deployment

When comparing Qt for MCUs vs LVGL, our independent study with Spyrosoft shows that Qt for MCUs reduces development time for microcontroller GUI by 30% compared to LVGL. The efficiency improvement comes from Qt’s integrated toolchain, which facilitates better collaboration among designers (Figma to Qt), developers (Qt Creator or Visual Studio Code), and QA engineers (Squish for MCUs), making Qt for MCUs ideal for complex projects with cross-functional teams. Additionally, Qt for MCUs offers comprehensive safety certification packages for safety-critical industries such as automotive, two-wheelers, and medical applications, positioning it as a superior LVGL alternative when functional safety and regulatory compliance are essential.